Special Alert Newsletter - April 2011
To subscribe: e-mail Des Griffin at alert@midnightmessenger.com
 Dear Friends:
As we head toward Summer, many things are “laying heavily” on the minds of millions of Americans. Unemployment, gas prices, food prices, inflation, and terrible weather conditions, to name just a few.
The price of gas (up more than a dollar a gallon in just a few months, and headed higher) is presently in the forefront of the minds of many. On tight budgets, millions are skimping on other items such as food in order to fill their gas tanks to get to and from work (if they still have a job). Currently, this “crisis” is frequently a topic of discussion on prime time network “news” programs. On cue, highly-paid financial and political “experts” are called upon to pump their dubious, politically correct opinions into the unsuspecting, unquestioning ears and minds of untold millions of TV viewers from coast to coast. Political correctness and economic “spin” are almost always the order of the day. In recent weeks we have never once heard one of these highly paid “professionals” approach the subject from a factual perspective. But then, in today’s “America” few appear to have an interest in addressing any subject from a factual perspective.
As most of these TV phonies are beholden to special interests for their livelihood, the “expert” and “informed” opinions they dispense are problematic at best. For these “talking heads” to appear competent and trustworthy — and to ensure that their paychecks (or automatic bank deposits) continue to flow into their accounts — their observations are all too frequently tainted by their “political correctness.” What viewers get is the political “spin de jour.” The trick is for them to appear knowledgeable and concerned while spinning their own officially-approved version of the party line. Career-wise, to “rock the boat” could have catastrophic consequences. The true causes of the affects we see around us are seldom if ever mentioned. The mesmerised and manipulated masses lap it all up without questioning a word. “We saw and heard it on TV. It must be true.”
WHAT “ENERGY CRISIS”?
For more than 45 years the federal government has been dangling a never-ending series of “crises” over the heads of the American public. Though never officially admitted, there are ulterior motives behind almost every one of these events. They are designed and created for one specific purpose — “to keep the populace alarmed (and clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” It is in reality a confidence trick implemented through psychological manipulation. As Rahm Emanuel, Mayor of Chicago, stated in a TV interview, “you never let a serious crisis go to waste... it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before...”
Such deceptive tactics are Machiavellian in nature. As defined by the late Archibald Roberts, Lt. Col. AUS, in The Most Secret Science, “Revolutionaries in government have created universal chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition America for the ‘New World Order.’
“Although the technique is as old as politics itself, in modern terms it is known as the Hegelian Principle for bringing about social change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis, and Synthesis. The first step (Thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (Antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic, hysteria). The third step (Synthesis) is to offer a solution to the problem created in step one — change that would have been impossible to impose on the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.
“Applying the Hegelian Principle, and irresistible financial influence, concealed mattoids seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves — ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.
“Their objective is to emasculate sovereign nations, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world’s people and resources.”
These mattoids (people with innately abnormal minds bordering on insanity) use harassment and coercion to intimidate and manipulate whole populations into going along with their diabolical political agendas. This form of social engineering or psychological manipulation of “public opinion” is designed to instil fear (False Evidence Appearing Real) in the minds of the public in order to corral them, like dumb sheep, thus guaranteeing compliance. It has proven a remarkably successful tool. Control is always the name of the game.
IN EXCHANGE FOR “SECURITY”
To more clearly understand the political game being played with the minds of the American public, we need to go back to the early 1960s. At that time, the idea of America surrendering her sovereignty to join a “new world order” was totally foreign to most. It was “un-American.” That mindset had to be drastically changed if that ultimate goal were to be achieved. It became obvious that a long series of “crises” had to be created in order to bring such a constitutionally abhorrent condition to fruition. Clearly, a plan of action was needed — one that would induce the population into willingly surrendering their precious, long and hard-fought-for Rights in exchange for “security.”
In 1963, people at the highest levels of political and financial power in Washington created A Special Study Group to investigate various methods by which this task might be accomplished. In August of that year, an agent approached 15 already proven experts in various fields to say that they had been selected to serve on a Commission “of the highest importance.” They were all American citizens.
The first meeting of the Group was held at Iron Mountain, New York. To throw off any snoops, the various experts used false names. From then on, they met on an average of once a month, mostly at weekends, and usually for two days. The Group always met at different locations all over the country, except for the first and last meetings which were at Iron Mountain. They never met in Washington, or on government property. Although participants took notes for their own use, there were no minutes of the meetings.
The Group was told that, traditionally, governments had used war to defeat their enemies and to manipulate and control their own people under the guise of “patriotism.” A “different kind of thinking” was now needed to create “the equivalent of war.” This charade was needed to accomplish the same objectives — bigger government, bigger debt, and greater control over the population. There was to be “no agonizing over cultural or religious values. No moral posturing” (foreword, p.xx). An acceptable surrogate for the war system [would] require expenditure of resources for completely nonproductive purposes at a level comparable to that of the military expenditures otherwise demanded by the size and complexity of each society. Such a substitute system of apparent ‘waste’ must be of a nature that will permit it to remain independent of the normal supply/demand economy. It must be subject to arbitrary political control.”
At the initial meeting at Iron Mountain, the members of the Group were given an important assignment. Ostensibly, the goal was to devise methods whereby conditions would be created that would result in “permanent peace.” When stripped of all its Orwellian double-talk, that term was a euphemism for the ultimate elimination of all opposition to their true agenda — the creation of a totalitarian new world order.
“[A] credible substitute for war must generate an omnipresent and readily understood fear of personal destruction. This fear must be of a nature and degree sufficient to ensure adherence to societal values to the full extent that they are acknowledged to transcend the value of individual human life” (p.83).
The public’s “allegiance requires a cause; a cause requires an enemy. This much is obvious; the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must be genuinely formidable. Roughly speaking, the presumed power of the ‘enemy’ sufficient to warrant an individual sense of allegiance to a society must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the society. Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness.” [In other words, that power would have to be realistic enough to “scare the hell” out of most people, and thus corral them into waging the “equivalent of war” against the “presumed enemy.” As H.L. Mencken famously said, The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”
The Report continues, “the historic analogy (of war) serves as a reminder that a viable substitute for war as a social system cannot be a mere symbolic charade. It must involve real risk of real personal destruction and on a scale consistent with the size and complexity of modern social systems. Credibility is the key. Whether the substitute is ritual in nature or functionally substantive, unless it provides a believable life-and death threat it will not serve the socially organizing function of war... The menace must be believable, it must be of a magnitude consistent with the complexity of the society threatened, and it must appear, at least, to affect the whole society” (p.47). To achieve their ultimate objective, such phony “wars”had to be waged at various levels — health, environment, poverty, housing etc. (pgs.59-60). Each one had to “meet two principal criteria: They must be wasteful ... and operate outside the normal supply-demand system... with the planned average annual destruction of not less that 10 percent of gross national product...” (p.58).
The “problem” faced by our bought-and-paid-for leaders in Washington was the deliberate manufacture of “enemies” against which to wage phony wars. Each enemy had to “lend itself extraordinarily well to arbitrary control.” Then, there had to be additional “enemies” waiting in the wings so that, “in the event some individual project unexpectedly succeeds there would be no dearth of substitute problems” (p.62).
“However unlikely some of the possible alternate enemies we have mentioned may seem, we must emphasize that one must be found, of credible quality and magni-ude, if a transition to peace is ever to come around. It is more probably in our judgment that such a threat will have to be invented, rather than developed from untold conditions... (p.67).
Did you get that? Threats of credible quality and magnitude “will have to be invented.” INVENTED? Webster defines that word as: “devised; contrived; forged; fabricated. Create or design something that didn’t exist before.” That describes exactly what happened next across the American political landscape. Independent, powerful, wealthy, and vibrantly alive America (once “the land of the free and home of the brave”) had to be laid waste or “urban renewed” in preparation for its absorption into the New World Order.
Voila! The first major contrived or fabricated domestic “crisis” against which “war” had to be waged emerged as the “energy crisis” of the late 1960s and early 70s. It was generally believed by the public that “those greedy Arabs” had imposed an oil embargo and were depriving Americans of oil that we had being purchasing for $3 a barrel.
At the time, this writer was working near the Port of Long Beach, California, and was “suffering” the inconvenience of joining huge lines in order to get gas that cost 30-35 cents a gallon. After first accepting the official story about the shortage, and being at the time unaware of political reality, he became aware of some facts that seemed to contradict the official line. He worked under a man whose next door neighbor worked for Arco, the financial vice-president of which was Thornton Bradshaw, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, or “Invisible Government.” From this oil man he learned that dozens of fully-laden oil tankers were “parked” off the coast, just beyond the horizon. The tankers were allowed to come in, one at a time. Instead of going to local refineries, their precious cargoes were being shipped by night up to a huge storage facility at Boron, on the edge of the Mojave Desert. The “crisis” was another charade. This sad fact was confirmed by a variety of informed sources. Lloyd’s of London, the world’s leading maritime insurers, revealed that during the three months prior to the alleged “embargo” 474 tankers sailed from Middle East ports with oil for the rest of the world. During the three months at the height of the “embargo,” 492 tankers sailed from the same ports laden with oil. These facts were carried in the European media, but blacked out in America.
On the American front, the chicanery was equally blatant. A report issued in December 1972 by the National Petroleum Council estimated there were 810,000,000,000 barrels of crude oil within the borders of the United States — a 125-year supply. The same report estimated there was also close to a 100-year supply of natural gas. The U.S. News and World Report confirmed the ready availability of vast amounts of crude oil in America.
Although it had been known for years that there was oil in Alaska, it wasn’t until 1968 that Arco struck it rich with its discovery of America’s largest oilfield in Prudhoe Bay on Alaska’s North Slope. A number of major oil companies formed a consortium to build the 800-mile pipeline necessary to pump the crude oil to the Port of Valdes on its way to the American market. Pipeline construction costs were estimated at $600,000, 000. But there was one gigantic problem — the federal bureaucracy in Washington. After massive bureaucratic and environmental roadblocks had been overcome and construction begun (in 1973, with 515 federal permits), the projected cost had soared more than 300 percent to $2,000, 000, 000, 000. The construction phase was a nightmare for its builders. Swarms of arrogant bureaucrats and overly zealous environmentalists invaded Alaska and did everything in their power to undermine the project and raise costs. The “success” of their efforts is reflected in the fact that, when completed 38 months later, construction costs had skyrocketed to a staggering $12,000,000,000 ($12 billion) — 20 times the original estimated cost.
Another shocking fact. Unknown to most Americans, 60 percent of the energy produced at Prudhoe Bay is natural gas, of which crude oil is a by-product. Early on, the federal government refused to grant the oil companies permits to build a natural gas pipeline to carry this vital resource to the lower 48 States. What happens to the (earlier estimated) 190,000,000 cubit feet of natural gas produced each day? It is pumped back into the ground at great expense. In fact, Prudhoe Bay (some 100 square miles) is just one of many oil-rich areas on Alaska’s North Slope which covers 75,000 square miles. The oil companies have proven that the whole area is one endless ocean of energy. In the words of an Arco executive bulletin dated 27 July, 1983, it’s “ready to be put to use.” But, no! The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), conveniently created in 1970, stepped in and prevented “it being put to use.” Today, the EPA has 17,500 employees and an annual budget of $10,500,000,000. Shortage? They’ve got to be kidding!
Just days ago, on 24 April, after Shell had spent nearly $4 billion on additional research projects, the EPA again refused to grant them development permits in areas where the oil is virtually pumping itself out of the ground via artesian flow.
Several things are abundantly clear. In past decades there never was a genuine energy crisis. Even more clearly, there is not a true energy crisis today. And with the recent discovery of a massive amount of crude oil in the Bakken Basin region of Montana and North Dakota (plus Saskatchewan, Canada) — estimated by the U.S. Geological Survey in 2008 at 43,000,000,000 barrels — any talk of an energy crisis can hardly be advanced with a straight face. Only a paid political puppet, a “true-believer” who doesn’t want to be confused with the facts, a brain-dead “environmentalist” who has been conned into insensibility by baseless propaganda, or a blatant liar can continue to spread such an outright falsehood. The present “energy crisis,” like so many others, bears a “Made in Washington” label. There is a super abundance of available energy as soon as the federal government permits its development.
That being said, a truly grave crisis does exist! It’s political and financial in nature. It was created and is being sustained by bought-and-paid-for political charlatans in our nation’s capital. At the top, they are deliberately and maliciously promoting a political agenda designed to enslave mankind. As was stated in the Report From Iron Mountain, these threats “of credible quality and magnitude” had to be invented (“devised; contrived; forged; fabricated”)
The phony energy crisis is only one of many contrived or fabricated “crises” being used by these treacherous political prostitutes who are doing everything in their power to destroy what remains of the American Dream. As documented in Fourth Reich of the Rich, Descent Into Slavery? and Storming the Gates of Hell, these political whores, in contemptuous violation of their Oaths of Office, have “sold their souls” to their occultic and financial taskmasters, who aim to drag America down to the level of a third-world nonentity, and “controlled in a feudalistic fashion” by the occultists and international bankers (Tragedy and Hope, by Dr. Carroll Quigley, p.324) The sending of multiple millions of jobs overseas, America’s participation in these phony “hot wars,” and the ongoing created financial crisis are additional manifestations of the working out of that overall plan.
The bottom line is, as proven in the above books, spiritual in nature. The plans to create or New World Order are Luciferian (Satanic) in nature. They will ultimately be crushed.
Our belief is based on the fact that all ultimate power has been given to the Lord Jesus Christ (Matthew 28:18, also Revelation 17:13-18, 19:1-2, 11-16; 21:6-8. Also Psalm 2).
Let God be true, and every man a liar.
Best Wishes,
Des Griffin
|
